Relativity aiR: Complete Review
FedRAMP-authorized generative AI platform for legal document review
Relativity aiR is a FedRAMP-authorized generative AI platform specifically engineered for enterprise-scale legal document review and eDiscovery workflows within the legal technology ecosystem. The platform combines generative AI with natural language processing, machine learning, and social network analysis to deliver comprehensive document analysis capabilities for large law firms, government agencies, and corporate legal departments handling massive document volumes[38][42][43].
Market Position & Maturity
Market Standing
Relativity maintains a dominant position in the legal technology market with over 75 percent of its business transitioned to cloud operations, indicating substantial market presence and successful strategic execution[51].
Company Maturity
The company's transition to over 75 percent cloud-based business operations demonstrates substantial market presence and strategic commitment to cloud-native AI delivery[51].
Growth Trajectory
Relativity reports hundreds of customers leveraging aiR solutions with more than 130 early users specifically for the aiR platform as of mid-2025[38][51].
Industry Recognition
FedRAMP authorization provides Relativity with unique competitive positioning for government and public sector applications, creating regulatory compliance advantages that competitors often cannot match[38][43].
Strategic Partnerships
The company's strategic partnership with Microsoft Azure for OpenAI services integration demonstrates enterprise-grade technology relationships and access to cutting-edge AI capabilities[53].
Longevity Assessment
The cloud-only strategy by 2028 demonstrates strategic commitment to future technology trends while providing three-year advance notice for customer planning[51].
Proof of Capabilities
Customer Evidence
JND Legal Administration achieved quantifiable results helping a government agency conduct issues review on 650,000 documents in one week, uncovering 66,000 documents related to critical issues and identifying 122 essential documents[48].
Quantified Outcomes
Customer implementations consistently report up to 70% cost savings, 80% reduction in review time, and over 90% recall rates across diverse use cases[38].
Case Study Analysis
A Fortune 100 telecom company used aiR for Privilege to achieve faster privilege review compared to manual processes, substantial cost savings on a single project, high recall rates, and precision in identifying privileged documents before production[54].
Market Validation
Relativity reports hundreds of customers leveraging aiR solutions with more than 130 early users specifically for the aiR platform as of mid-2025[38][51].
Competitive Wins
Ben Sexton from JND noted that both state and federal agencies express tremendous interest in using aiR for Review because they handle some of the largest and most challenging projects, often with very limited resources[38].
Reference Customers
Documented implementations span government agencies, Fortune 100 corporations, and large law firms, demonstrating platform versatility across different organizational types and use cases.
AI Technology
Relativity aiR employs Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, combining generative model prompts with document knowledge bases to ground AI responses in source material rather than original training data[37].
Architecture
The platform's technical architecture leverages Microsoft Azure's OpenAI services while ensuring customer data remains secure within the RelativityOne ecosystem[53].
Primary Competitors
Relativity aiR competes with established players like Thomson Reuters and emerging AI-focused vendors.
Competitive Advantages
FedRAMP authorization creates distinct competitive advantages for government and public sector applications, addressing organizations requiring federal security compliance that competitors often cannot match[38][43].
Market Positioning
Relativity aiR positions itself as an enterprise-grade, comprehensive AI platform for legal document review, competing with established players like Thomson Reuters and emerging AI-focused vendors.
Win/Loss Scenarios
Relativity aiR wins when organizations require FedRAMP-authorized AI capabilities, comprehensive document review within unified platforms, high-volume document processing, and can invest in proper change management. Alternatives win when organizations need rapid deployment with minimal change management, specialized functionality, limited budgets, or multi-vendor flexibility.
Key Features
Pros & Cons
Use Cases
Featured In Articles
How We Researched This Guide
About This Guide: This comprehensive analysis is based on extensive competitive intelligence and real-world implementation data from leading AI vendors. StayModern updates this guide quarterly to reflect market developments and vendor performance changes.
56+ verified sources per analysis including official documentation, customer reviews, analyst reports, and industry publications.
- • Vendor documentation & whitepapers
- • Customer testimonials & case studies
- • Third-party analyst assessments
- • Industry benchmarking reports
Standardized assessment framework across 8 key dimensions for objective comparison.
- • Technology capabilities & architecture
- • Market position & customer evidence
- • Implementation experience & support
- • Pricing value & competitive position
Research is refreshed every 90 days to capture market changes and new vendor capabilities.
- • New product releases & features
- • Market positioning changes
- • Customer feedback integration
- • Competitive landscape shifts
Every claim is source-linked with direct citations to original materials for verification.
- • Clickable citation links
- • Original source attribution
- • Date stamps for currency
- • Quality score validation
Analysis follows systematic research protocols with consistent evaluation frameworks.
- • Standardized assessment criteria
- • Multi-source verification process
- • Consistent evaluation methodology
- • Quality assurance protocols
Buyer-focused analysis with transparent methodology and factual accuracy commitment.
- • Objective comparative analysis
- • Transparent research methodology
- • Factual accuracy commitment
- • Continuous quality improvement
Quality Commitment: If you find any inaccuracies in our analysis on this page, please contact us at research@staymodern.ai. We're committed to maintaining the highest standards of research integrity and will investigate and correct any issues promptly.